MaskEX Risk Assessment Tool
Risk Assessment
Your Risk Assessment
Risk Level:
Recommendation: Based on your inputs, you should consider withdrawing your funds immediately. MaskEX has a 1/100 trust score from Gridinsoft, and our calculation shows a high risk of losing your funds.
For safer alternatives: Consider regulated exchanges like Kraken, Coinbase, or Binance that publish proof of reserves and have transparent regulatory status.
MaskEX Crypto Exchange Review: Is It Safe or a Scam in 2025?
If you're thinking about using MaskEX to trade crypto, you need to know the truth before you deposit any money. This isn't just another exchange. It's a platform with glowing app ratings, high leverage offers, and bold claims about being licensed in multiple countries - but also a 1 out of 100 trust score from security experts, zero verified reviews on professional forums, and dozens of user reports about locked funds and silent support teams.
MaskEX launched in 2021, based in Dubai, and markets itself as a privacy-focused crypto exchange with a built-in wallet. It says it’s approved by Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA), licensed in Canada, and registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Sounds legit, right? But here’s the problem: no public records confirm any of those licenses. Not one. Not even a link to a government registry. Meanwhile, Gridinsoft, a cybersecurity firm that tracks scam sites, gives MaskEX a trust score of 1/100 - the lowest possible rating.
What MaskEX Actually Offers
MaskEX isn’t shy about features. You can trade over 132 crypto pairs, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and Shiba Inu. Spot trading has a flat 0.09% fee for both makers and takers. Deposits are free. Withdrawals? They vary by coin, but users report delays of up to 72 hours - sometimes longer.
The real draw? Leverage. MaskEX offers up to 125x leverage on USDT-M futures contracts. That’s the same as Binance on select pairs, and higher than Bybit’s 100x or KuCoin’s 100x cap. But high leverage doesn’t mean safe. It means you can lose your entire deposit faster than you can click ‘sell.’ And with no transparent volume data, you’re trading in a vacuum. CoinMarketCap lists MaskEX as ‘untracked,’ meaning its daily volume isn’t verified by any major data provider. That’s a red flag. Top exchanges like Binance and Coinbase report volumes in billions. MaskEX? Nobody knows.
Privacy Claims vs. Reality
MaskEX says it’s built for privacy. It claims crypto-only users don’t need full KYC. That sounds great if you value anonymity. But here’s the catch: if you want to deposit fiat - using a credit card or via Mercuryo or AlchemyPay - you’re forced through KYC. So who’s really getting privacy? Probably not you. And if you’re hoping to avoid government scrutiny, you’re missing the bigger picture: global regulators are cracking down hard on exchanges that skip proper identity checks.
In July 2024, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) tightened rules on exchanges with weak KYC. MaskEX’s model - offering partial anonymity while claiming to be licensed in multiple countries - puts it directly in the crosshairs. Experts at Messari called out exchanges like this in their Q3 2024 report: “Claiming multiple international licenses without transparent filings warrants heightened scrutiny.” That’s MaskEX in one sentence.
User Experiences: The Dark Side
The Google Play Store shows MaskEX with 4.0 stars from 115 reviews. Sounds good? Look closer. The app has only 10,000+ downloads. For a platform offering 125x leverage and claiming global reach, that’s tiny. And those reviews? Many are vague: “Easy to use,” “Good interface,” “Fast copy trading.” No details. No depth.
Meanwhile, Trustpilot has zero verified reviews. Forex Peace Army, a trusted forum for traders, has no reviews at all - not one. That’s not normal. Legitimate exchanges get flooded with user feedback, both good and bad. MaskEX? Silence.
But on Reddit, the story changes. Users in r/CryptoCurrency report account freezes, unresponsive support, and withdrawals that never arrive. One user, CryptoWatcher2024, said they deposited $1,200 and got zero response after 14 days. Another said their account was locked without warning after a small trade. These aren’t isolated complaints. They’re patterns. And they’re consistent with what we’ve seen on other failed exchanges.
Security and Regulatory Red Flags
MaskEX claims VARA approval. But VARA’s official public registry of licensed exchanges doesn’t list MaskEX as fully licensed - only as having “initial approval.” That’s like saying you’ve applied for a driver’s license but haven’t passed the test. It’s not the same thing.
Claims of Canadian and Saint Vincent licenses? No public databases confirm them. No government websites mention MaskEX. No press releases. No official filings. That’s not oversight - that’s deception.
And then there’s the domain age. CoinMarketCap says MaskEX launched in 2021. But Gridinsoft’s records show the domain was registered in 2020 - nearly five years ago. Why the mismatch? Is the company hiding something? Or is the 2021 launch date just marketing spin?
CryptoCompare’s risk assessment gives MaskEX a “high-risk” rating. Their report says exchanges with similar profiles - unverified licenses, low volume, privacy claims without transparency - have an 87% failure rate within 18 months. That’s not a warning. That’s a countdown.
How It Compares to the Big Players
| Feature | MaskEX | Binance | Kraken | Coinbase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trading Pairs | 132+ | 500+ | 200+ | 150+ |
| Max Leverage | 125x | 125x (select pairs) | 50x | 20x |
| Verified Volume | Untracked | $30.2B/day | $2.1B/day | $4.7B/day |
| Regulatory Status | Claimed, unverified | Licensed in 50+ jurisdictions | Licensed in U.S., EU, Canada | Licensed in U.S., EU, Canada |
| Proof of Reserves | No | Yes, monthly | Yes, quarterly | Yes, quarterly |
| Trust Score (Gridinsoft) | 1/100 | 97/100 | 95/100 | 94/100 |
| Customer Support Response | Often 72+ hours | Under 4 hours | Under 6 hours | Under 5 hours |
MaskEX looks tempting because of the leverage and low fees. But when you compare it to exchanges that actually publish their reserves, answer support tickets quickly, and operate under verified licenses - the gap is terrifying.
Who Should Avoid MaskEX
If you’re new to crypto and want to learn, skip MaskEX. There are no educational resources like Binance Academy or Coinbase Learn. No guides, no webinars, no risk calculators.
If you care about safety, skip MaskEX. No proof of reserves. No transparent audits. No public team. Just a CEO named Eric Yang with no LinkedIn profile or public track record.
If you’ve ever lost money on a platform because support disappeared - you know what this feels like. MaskEX is a repeat of past failures: high rewards, zero accountability.
Final Verdict: Too Risky to Use
MaskEX isn’t just risky. It’s dangerous. The combination of unverified licenses, zero verified reviews, low trust scores, and widespread withdrawal complaints makes it one of the most concerning exchanges in the crypto space right now.
Yes, the interface is clean. Yes, the leverage is high. Yes, you can deposit with a credit card. But none of that matters if you can’t get your money out.
There are hundreds of better options. Kraken, Coinbase, Binance, Bitstamp - they all have real licenses, real audits, and real customer support. You don’t need to gamble on a platform with a 1/100 trust score when you can use one with a 95+ score.
MaskEX feels like a trap dressed up as a trading platform. Don’t be the next person who wakes up to a frozen account and no way to get help.
Is MaskEX a scam?
MaskEX isn’t officially listed as a scam by CryptoScamDB, but it has all the hallmarks of one: unverified licenses, zero professional reviews, a 1/100 trust score from Gridinsoft, and consistent user reports of withdrawal failures. While it’s not confirmed as a scam yet, it’s in the high-risk category where 87% of similar platforms fail within 18 months.
Can I trust MaskEX with my crypto?
No. MaskEX doesn’t publish proof of reserves, doesn’t allow third-party audits, and has no track record of security transparency. If your crypto is stored on MaskEX, you’re trusting a company with no public accountability. For any amount over $100, use a wallet you control - not an exchange you can’t verify.
Why does MaskEX have a 4.0-star rating on Google Play?
The 4.0-star rating comes from only 115 reviews - a tiny sample size. Many reviews are generic (“easy to use,” “good app”) with no details. Professional traders don’t use Google Play to review exchanges. The lack of reviews on Trustpilot, Forex Peace Army, and Reddit suggests the ratings may be inflated or manipulated. Real users with serious trading activity aren’t leaving feedback - likely because they’ve already lost money.
Does MaskEX really have VARA approval?
MaskEX claims “initial approval” from Dubai’s VARA, but it’s not listed in VARA’s official public registry of licensed exchanges. Initial approval means the application is under review - not that the license is granted. Many platforms use this language to mislead users into thinking they’re fully regulated. VARA has licensed 17 exchanges as of Q3 2024. MaskEX is not among them.
What should I do if I already deposited on MaskEX?
Withdraw everything you can, immediately. Don’t wait for a “better time.” If you’ve already tried and failed to withdraw, contact your bank or payment provider (like Mercuryo or AlchemyPay) to dispute the transaction if possible. Document every interaction with support - screenshots, emails, timestamps. There’s no guarantee you’ll get your money back, but acting fast gives you the best shot. Avoid depositing more.
Are there safer alternatives to MaskEX?
Yes. Kraken, Coinbase, and Binance are all regulated, publish proof of reserves, and have responsive customer support. If you want high leverage, Bybit and OKX offer up to 125x with verified licenses and strong track records. If privacy matters, consider decentralized exchanges like Uniswap or PancakeSwap - you keep control of your keys. There’s no reason to risk your funds on an unverified platform when trusted options exist.
There are 16 Comments
Eric Redman
Jason Coe
David Roberts
Beth Devine
Hanna Kruizinga
Jessica Hulst
Phyllis Nordquist
Brett Benton
Brian McElfresh
Monty Tran
Kaela Coren
David James
Shaunn Graves
Elizabeth Melendez
Jeremy Jaramillo
Sammy Krigs
Write a comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *